sportskeeda
SUDAN is caught in a severe civil war, yet football continues to thrive, offering a glimpse of humanity amid tremendous hardship.
Although football isn’t perfect, history shows that it motivates people and generates moments of beauty in times of crisis.
2
Many people remember the match on Christmas Day 1914 during a temporary truce between German and British troops.
On another note, footballs were given to our forces as they pushed forward against enemy lines.
Women played their part in the war effort, forming football teams in various munitions factories.
However, soon after, the FA prohibited women’s official football for 50 years, deeming it improper.
Perhaps this was the case, yet the enormous crowds, including 50,000 in Preston, seemed to unsettle officials.
Football is only “war” in the heated minds of inebriated fans, misguided souls, or simpletons, and thankfully, it has only been a significant factor in instigating conflict once.
This incident arose after a 1969 World Cup qualifier between El Salvador and Honduras, whose governments were already at odds as neighboring Central American countries.
This conflict lasted a mere four days but resulted in over 2,000 fatalities and the downing of three El Salvadorian aircraft.
Using war as a narrative backdrop is not uncommon, but in Sudan, it represents a dire struggle for survival.
About 150,000 lives have been lost, and 14 million people have been displaced. Football stadiums in the capital, Khartoum, have turned into places of grief.
2
Currently, Sudan has had to play its home matches in five different neighboring African countries.
Head coach James Kwesi Appiah notes, “Frequently, while in camp, we hear news of a player losing a family member. This has happened around five times.
“Why can’t we unite to help these players succeed so that at least those at home can experience joy?”
Appiah, a former captain and coach of Ghana, has steered Sudan to the Africa Cup of Nations finals set to take place in Morocco next year, putting them within striking distance of the 2026 World Cup.
This accomplishment is astounding. Amid the chaos in Sudan, it stands as a symbol of hope.
When war descends into fanaticism, the outcomes can be extraordinary.
In Afghanistan, the male-centric Taliban forbade women’s sports, and globally, this violation has largely been accepted.
No sanctions have been imposed, allowing the country’s men—who may not excel at football but are competent in cricket—to carry on without objection or embarrassment.
Neither war nor pestilence can keep a great team down.
Why should they? In such circumstances, only men are deemed important.
A handful of women have succeeded in overcoming this oppression.
The Afghan cricket team sought asylum in Australia, where the cricket authority took a singular stand by refusing to participate in men’s matches against the rogue nation.
The International Cricket Council has remained quiet, and instead of boycotting, Afghanistan’s men’s team continues to flourish.
The same determination is evident in the Ukrainian Premier League, which is resisting the Russian invasion and has recently secured a new television deal. The 16-team league has only paused for Covid.
Shakhtar Donetsk and Dynamo Kyiv have consistently been the top contenders since the league’s inception following the country’s split from Russia.
Indeed, after the invasion, Shakhtar moved from Donetsk to Kyiv, where they, along with Dynamo and Metalist 1925, utilize the Olympic stadium with a 70,500 capacity.
This illustrates that neither war nor pestilence can suppress a capable team.
